This site contains promotional content intended for UK Healthcare Professionals and other relevant decision makers | Not a HCP? Visit our  Public Site.

Adverse Event reporting can be found at the bottom of the page | Prescribing Information for the relevant medicine can be found adjacent to the below content and/or in the footer below. 

Real World Evidence

The Kyleena
®
(19.5mg levonorgestrel) Satisfaction Study (KYSS)

Kyleena satisfaction study

KYSS is a prospective, multinational, single-arm, observational study.

Kyleena® placement was attempted in 1,129 women and successful in 1,126 women

img

The majority of women were between 18 and 35 years of age (67.1%, n=756).

Participants were recruited from Belgium, Canada, Germany, Mexico, Norway, Sweden, Spain and the USA, from 2017 to 2018.

† Either a COC or a POP.

‡ "Other" includes all methods with <10% of women using them: vaginal HC (3.1%), non-hormonal IUD (3.0%), natural planning (1.2%), implant (0.7%), Injectables, transdermal HC (0.2%) and backup contraception (0.09%).

COC – combined oral contraceptive; HC – hormonal contraception; IUD – intrauterine device; IUS – intrauterine system; KYSS – Kyleena Satisfaction Study;
POP – progestogen-only pill

 

Women want more from their contraception than just clinical efficacy

Women want more from their contraception than just clinical efficacy

Kyleena: placement rated as easy for most women regardless of parity

91-77

Misperceptions around IUS placement may be a barrier to its use among parous and nulliparous women,
 but the RWE from KYSS can bring confidence to your patients
 (n=1,110)

87-85

Satisfaction was similarly high for both parous and nulliparous women

Kyleena
®
: high satisfaction rates, irrespective of age

Percentage of women satisfied with Kyleena, by age

real world evidence

Adapted from Stovall DW et al 2021

Most women were satisfied with Kyleena
®
,
 no matter their…

pill-icons

Previous contraception

85.2% of women who switched from an oral HC were satisfied (n=317) 

Motivation for choosing Kyleena
®†

84.3% of women who chose Kyleena® mainly for its low-hormone dose were satisfied (n=248)


* Results shown represent women who reported being “very satisfied” or “somewhat satisfied” with Kyleena® at the end of the final visit.
† Results shown for each of the topics mentioned are representative of one of the subgroups only. Not all patients had the same previous contraception, motivation for choosing Kyleena®, or country of residency.
HC – hormonal contraception

Kyleena
®
demonstrated a high level of satisfaction with the bleeding profile in KYSS


img

Bleeding profile satisfaction is important, as it can significantly impact women’s quality of life
 

* A total of 632/887 women in KYSS reported their satisfaction with their bleeding profile while on Kyleena®.
KYSS – Kyleena® Satisfaction Study


81.5% of patients in the patient safety analysis group experienced no adverse events with Kyleena
®

img
Discontinued Kyleena

Discontinued Kyleena® due to TEAEs and TESAEs, respectively

*The most common TEAEs were gastrointestinal disorders 3.3%, reproductive system and breast disorders 9.5% and infections and infestations 2.3%

SAF – safety analysis set; TEAE – treatment-emergent adverse event; TESAE – treatment-emergent serious adverse event.
Please refer to the SmPC for the full summary of Kyleena's safety profile

Few women discontinued Kyleena
®
in KYSS

few-women-discontinued-Kyleena-in-KYSS

Discontinuation SAF, n (%)

Total (N=1,129)

Kyleena® still in use at planned EoO

919 (81.4)

Kyleena® discontinued before planned EoO

210 (18.6)

Discontinuation due to TEAEs

69 (6.1)

Discontinuation due to TESAEs

4 (0.4)

Primary reason for discontinuation

Unsuccessful Kyleena® placement attempt

3 (0.3)

Lost to follow-up

105 (9.3)

Expulsion of Kyleena®

6 (0.5)

Removal of Kyleena®

94 (8.3)

(Serious) adverse event

62 (5.5)

Pregnancy

3 (0.3)

Wish for pregnancy

11 (1.0)

Switch contraceptive methods

6 (0.5)

Dissatisfaction with Kyleena®

9 (0.8)

Investigator decision

1 (0.09)

Not specified

0 (0.0)

Adapted from Stovall DW et al 2021

EoO – end of observation period; KYSS – Kyleena® Satisfaction Study; SAF – safety analysis set;
TEAE – treatment-emergent adverse event; TESAE – treatment-emergent serious adverse event

KYSS: new perspectives on Kyleena
®
Summary

  • a
    Women want more from their contraception than just reliable efficacy, such as no contraceptive routine and low hormone doses.
  • b
    Most Kyleena® placements were rated as easy by HCPs and associated with no or mild pain for women.
  • c
    Kyleena® was associated with high levels of satisfaction, regardless of age and/or parity*
  • d
    Women were generally satisfied with their bleeding profile while on Kyleena® – with only 2.5% of women discontinuing due to dissatisfaction with their bleeding profile
  • e
    The number of women experiencing adverse events with Kyleena® was low overall, with few related discontinuations

PP-PF-WHC-IUS-GB-0023 | February 2024