Real World Evidence
The Kyleena® (19.5mg levonorgestrel) Satisfaction Study (KYSS)
Kyleena satisfaction study
KYSS is a prospective, multinational, single-arm, observational study.
Kyleena® placement was attempted in 1,129 women and successful in 1,126 women

The majority of women were between 18 and 35 years of age (67.1%, n=756).
Participants were recruited from Belgium, Canada, Germany, Mexico, Norway, Sweden, Spain and the USA, from 2017 to 2018.
† Either a COC or a POP.
‡ "Other" includes all methods with <10% of women using them: vaginal HC (3.1%), non-hormonal IUD (3.0%), natural planning (1.2%), implant (0.7%), Injectables, transdermal HC (0.2%) and backup contraception (0.09%).
COC – combined oral contraceptive; HC – hormonal contraception; IUD – intrauterine device; IUS – intrauterine system; KYSS – Kyleena Satisfaction Study;
POP – progestogen-only pill
Women want more from their contraception than just clinical efficacy

Kyleena: placement rated as easy for most women regardless of parity


Kyleena®: high satisfaction rates, irrespective of age
Percentage of women satisfied with Kyleena, by age

Adapted from Stovall DW et al 2021
Most women were satisfied with Kyleena®, no matter their…
85.2% of women who switched from an oral HC were satisfied (n=317)
84.3% of women who chose Kyleena® mainly for its low-hormone dose were satisfied (n=248)
* Results shown represent women who reported being “very satisfied” or “somewhat satisfied” with Kyleena® at the end of the final visit.
† Results shown for each of the topics mentioned are representative of one of the subgroups only. Not all patients had the same previous contraception, motivation for choosing Kyleena®, or country of residency.
HC – hormonal contraception
Kyleena® demonstrated a high level of satisfaction with the bleeding profile in KYSS

Bleeding profile satisfaction is important, as it can significantly impact women’s quality of life
* A total of 632/887 women in KYSS reported their satisfaction with their bleeding profile while on Kyleena®.
KYSS – Kyleena® Satisfaction Study
81.5% of patients in the patient safety analysis group experienced no adverse events with Kyleena®


Discontinued Kyleena® due to TEAEs and TESAEs, respectively
*The most common TEAEs were gastrointestinal disorders 3.3%, reproductive system and breast disorders 9.5% and infections and infestations 2.3%
SAF – safety analysis set; TEAE – treatment-emergent adverse event; TESAE – treatment-emergent serious adverse event.
Please refer to the SmPC for the full summary of Kyleena's safety profile
Few women discontinued Kyleena® in KYSS

Discontinuation SAF, n (%) | Total (N=1,129) |
|---|---|
Kyleena® still in use at planned EoO | 919 (81.4) |
Kyleena® discontinued before planned EoO | 210 (18.6) |
Discontinuation due to TEAEs | 69 (6.1) |
Discontinuation due to TESAEs | 4 (0.4) |
Primary reason for discontinuation | |
Unsuccessful Kyleena® placement attempt | 3 (0.3) |
Lost to follow-up | 105 (9.3) |
Expulsion of Kyleena® | 6 (0.5) |
Removal of Kyleena® | 94 (8.3) |
(Serious) adverse event | 62 (5.5) |
Pregnancy | 3 (0.3) |
Wish for pregnancy | 11 (1.0) |
Switch contraceptive methods | 6 (0.5) |
Dissatisfaction with Kyleena® | 9 (0.8) |
Investigator decision | 1 (0.09) |
Not specified | 0 (0.0) |
Adapted from Stovall DW et al 2021
EoO – end of observation period; KYSS – Kyleena® Satisfaction Study; SAF – safety analysis set;
TEAE – treatment-emergent adverse event; TESAE – treatment-emergent serious adverse event
KYSS: new perspectives on Kyleena® Summary
Women want more from their contraception than just reliable efficacy, such as no contraceptive routine and low hormone doses.
Most Kyleena® placements were rated as easy by HCPs and associated with no or mild pain for women.
Kyleena® was associated with high levels of satisfaction, regardless of age and/or parity*
Women were generally satisfied with their bleeding profile while on Kyleena® – with only 2.5% of women discontinuing due to dissatisfaction with their bleeding profile
The number of women experiencing adverse events with Kyleena® was low overall, with few related discontinuations
PP-PF-WHC-IUS-GB-0023 | February 2024